Irritation Of Cute.

Love-able research as in a study cute aggression is a real phoneme for example Ms Dyer admitted she doesn't yet know why cuteness seems to provoke reactive aggression, even in such a relatively harmless form but she has a few hypotheses and one is put the bunny in the bin = 0

It could be that viewing an animal’ triggers people's desire to care for the creature, but the fact it is just a picture that frustrates an aggressive urge, prompting the aggressive responses. Or it could be that people could be focusing so hard on not hurting the animal that they actually do the opposite. Much as a child wanting to care for a pet might inadvertently squeeze it too tightly. Alternatively it could be similar to the way that many overwhelmingly positive emotions find expression in a way that looks negative squeezing or other. It like when a beauty queen breaks down in floods of tears after taking first prize in a pageant. 'It might be that how we deal with high positive-emotion is to sort of give it a negative pitch somehow,' Dyer told Live Science.
'That this response sort of regulates, keeps us level and releases that negative energy. Showing a helpless' Baby been happy just might get a smack: The researchers admitted she doesn't yet know why cuteness seems to provoke aggression, even in such a relatively harmless form but it now first tine been labelled. Its when a picture should evoke sympathy might do the opposite.
Lovable researchers found that people watching a slideshow of cute pictures popped more bubbles on a sheet of bubble wrap than those watching funny or neutral pictures Participants rated the animals on cuteness, funniness and how much they felt the pictures made than lost control - by seeing if they agreed with statements such as 'I can't handle it'. They also rated how much the pictures made them want to say things like 'grr!' and 'want to squeeze something'. The researchers found that the cuter the animal, the less control and the more desire to growl and squeeze something their participants felt. Moreover, cute animals prompted this response far more strongly than funny animals, which in turn produced the sensation more strongly than neutral animals.

When book club saw pictures of the dead portals tiger fighters in echoed shock. As in Tamil it echoed a relief response as a sort of erotic discourse a returned action human study says its a normal discourse.  Reaching out to pinch a infant on the cheeks may seem an incongruously aggressive response, to the sight of such a vulnerable individual but a new study claims it is 'actually normal'.
Researchers in the U.S. found that people watching a slideshow of cute pictures popped more bubbles on a sheet of bubble wrap than those watching funny or neutral pictures. The findings offer insight into the aggressive sounding exclamations people often give when they see things they regard as adorable, such as: 'I want to eat you up' Pinch able cheeks: A new study claims an incongruously aggressive response to cute things is ‘actually normal’. Rebecca Dyer, a graduate student in psychology at Yale University who presented the study to the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, said she believes its 'almost a sense of lost control'.
'You know, you can't stand it, you can't handle it, that kind of thing,' she told Ms Dyer explained that she and her fellow researchers first got interested in such 'cute aggression' after conversations about how adorable pictures on the internet often produce a desire to squeeze or squish the subject. The response seemed incongruous since all the existing research on cuteness has suggested that the reaction should be the opposite: A neutral animal might be a grown up dog with a serious expression, while a funny animal could be one with its head sticking out of a car window and a cute one might be a fluffy puppy.

So if it is cute to look at it may show urge to protect, this research says the 'very opposite'. The response seemed incongruous since all the existing research on cuteness has suggested that the reaction should be the opposite: People should want to treat a cute thing gently and carefully. Ms Dyer and Ms Aragon then ran a second experiment to ensure that the their results hadn't merely identified a verbal expression for cuteness, rather than a genuine feeling. They asked 90 volunteers of both sexes to view further slideshows of cute, funny and neutral animals, but this time to pop the bubbles in bubble wrap as they did.
As the researchers told the participants that the study was investigating motoring activity and memory and asked them to pop as many or as few bubbles as they wanted - as long as they were doing something involving display of innate motion ‘first emotion’. But in fact they really wanted to know if their volunteers would respond to the cute animals with an outward display of aggression by popping more of the bubbles compared with those viewing funny or neutral pictures. They found that the people shown the cute slideshow popped an average of 120 bubbles, compared with 100 for the neutral slideshow and just 80 for the funny one. People should want to treat acute thing gently and carefully. To test if 'cute aggression' was a real phenomenon, Ms Dyer and her co-author Oriana Aragon, also a Yale grad student, recruited 109 participants for an initial study looking at pictures of cute, funny or neutral animals.